↓ Skip to main content

Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
183 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma L. Williams, Tim Wharton, Caroline Jagoe

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 49 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 14%
Unspecified 9 9%
Linguistics 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 54 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2024.
All research outputs
#332,009
of 26,619,752 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#699
of 35,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,419
of 460,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#31
of 1,166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,619,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.