↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of four formulas for nasotracheal tube length estimation in pediatric patients: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 303)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of four formulas for nasotracheal tube length estimation in pediatric patients: an observational study
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), September 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashkan Taghizadeh Imani, Mehrdad Goudarzi, Niloufar Shababi, Behrang Nooralishahi, Alireza Mohseni

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Librarian 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,655,859
of 26,470,638 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#33
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,986
of 366,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,470,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.