Title |
Performance of Language-Coordinated Collective Systems: A Study of Wine Recognition and Description
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01321 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julian Zubek, Michał Denkiewicz, Agnieszka Dębska, Alicja Radkowska, Joanna Komorowska-Mach, Piotr Litwin, Magdalena Stępień, Adrianna Kucińska, Ewa Sitarska, Krystyna Komorowska, Riccardo Fusaroli, Kristian Tylén, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi |
Abstract |
Most of our perceptions of and engagements with the world are shaped by our immersion in social interactions, cultural traditions, tools and linguistic categories. In this study we experimentally investigate the impact of two types of language-based coordination on the recognition and description of complex sensory stimuli: that of red wine. Participants were asked to taste, remember and successively recognize samples of wines within a larger set in a two-by-two experimental design: (1) either individually or in pairs, and (2) with or without the support of a sommelier card-a cultural linguistic tool designed for wine description. Both effectiveness of recognition and the kinds of errors in the four conditions were analyzed. While our experimental manipulations did not impact recognition accuracy, bias-variance decomposition of error revealed non-trivial differences in how participants solved the task. Pairs generally displayed reduced bias and increased variance compared to individuals, however the variance dropped significantly when they used the sommelier card. The effect of sommelier card reducing the variance was observed only in pairs, individuals did not seem to benefit from the cultural linguistic tool. Analysis of descriptions generated with the aid of sommelier cards shows that pairs were more coherent and discriminative than individuals. The findings are discussed in terms of global properties and dynamics of collective systems when constrained by different types of cultural practices. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 3 | 50% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 16% |
Linguistics | 4 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |