The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Manipulating the soil microbiomes during a community recovery process with plant beneficial species for the suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMB Express, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13568-021-01225-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xu Zhang, Chao Xue, Dan Fang, Xiaohui He, Mengyu Wei, Chenjin Zhuo, Junyao Jin, Biao Shen, Rong Li, Ning Ling, Qirong Shen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,438,401
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#253
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,794
of 458,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.