↓ Skip to main content

Current Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes: Dissecting the Most Aggressive Form of Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes: Dissecting the Most Aggressive Form of Breast Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.681476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez, Pere Llinàs-Arias, Javier I. J. Orozco, Sandra Íñiguez-Muñoz, Matthew P. Salomon, Borja Sesé, Maggie L. DiNome, Diego M. Marzese

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Unspecified 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 98 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 98 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,317,761
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#520
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,090
of 449,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#33
of 1,443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.