The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease ― Implications of the ISCHEMIA Trial ―
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation Journal, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0345 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shun Kohsaka, Kenji Fukushima, Ippei Watanabe, Susumu Manabe, Nozomi Niimi, Yodo Gatate, Mitsuaki Sawano, Shintaro Nakano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,348,593
of 26,210,734 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#238
of 2,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,669
of 462,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.