↓ Skip to main content

The suppression of Antarctic bottom water formation by melting ice shelves in Prydz Bay

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The suppression of Antarctic bottom water formation by melting ice shelves in Prydz Bay
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12577
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. D. Williams, L. Herraiz-Borreguero, F. Roquet, T. Tamura, K. I. Ohshima, Y. Fukamachi, A. D. Fraser, L. Gao, H. Chen, C. R. McMahon, R. Harcourt, M. Hindell

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor 12 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 110 51%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 52 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#203,191
of 26,735,161 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,923
of 63,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,745
of 336,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#57
of 859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.