You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Beating Naive Bayes at Taxonomic Classification of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.644487 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michal Ziemski, Treepop Wisanwanichthan, Nicholas A. Bokulich, Benjamin D. Kaehler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 86% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
Researcher | 8 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,673,538
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,835
of 26,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,169
of 448,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#258
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.