↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Evaluation of the 5XFAD Mouse Model for Preclinical Testing Applications: A MODEL-AD Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Evaluation of the 5XFAD Mouse Model for Preclinical Testing Applications: A MODEL-AD Study
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2021.713726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian L. Oblak, Peter B. Lin, Kevin P. Kotredes, Ravi S. Pandey, Dylan Garceau, Harriet M. Williams, Asli Uyar, Rita O’Rourke, Sarah O’Rourke, Cynthia Ingraham, Daria Bednarczyk, Melisa Belanger, Zackary A. Cope, Gabriela J. Little, Sean-Paul G. Williams, Carl Ash, Adam Bleckert, Tim Ragan, Benjamin A. Logsdon, Lara M. Mangravite, Stacey J. Sukoff Rizzo, Paul R. Territo, Gregory W. Carter, Gareth R. Howell, Michael Sasner, Bruce T. Lamb

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 16%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Master 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 109 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 58 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 120 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,101,372
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#250
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,961
of 444,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#7
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.