The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of novel inhibitors for TNFα, TNFR1 and TNFα-TNFR1 complex using pharmacophore-based approaches
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-1965-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Madhu Sudhana Saddala, Hu Huang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 41 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,282
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,940
of 348,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#26
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.