The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local and Non-local Effects of Foam Rolling on Passive Soft Tissue Properties and Spinal Excitability
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.702042 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masatoshi Nakamura, Andreas Konrad, Ryosuke Kiyono, Shigeru Sato, Kaoru Yahata, Riku Yoshida, Koki Yasaka, Yuta Murakami, Futaba Sanuki, Jan Wilke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 13% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 10 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,042,864
of 26,230,991 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,197
of 15,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,558
of 459,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#111
of 619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,230,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.