↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamas Minarik, Barbara Berger, Laura Althaus, Veronika Bader, Bianca Biebl, Franziska Brotzeller, Theodor Fusban, Jessica Hegemann, Lea Jesteadt, Lukas Kalweit, Miriam Leitner, Francesca Linke, Natalia Nabielska, Thomas Reiter, Daniela Schmitt, Alexander Spraetz, Paul Sauseng

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Master 35 16%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 29%
Neuroscience 40 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,428,838
of 26,623,929 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,090
of 7,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,635
of 334,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#19
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.