↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Among COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Pediatric Pneumonias: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Among COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Pediatric Pneumonias: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2021.663884
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhongwei Jia, Xiangyu Yan, Liwei Gao, Shenggang Ding, Yan Bai, Yuejie Zheng, Yuxia Cui, Xianfeng Wang, Jingfeng Li, Gen Lu, Yi Xu, Xiangyu Zhang, Junhua Li, Ning Chen, Yunxiao Shang, Mingfeng Han, Jun Liu, Hourong Zhou, Cen Li, Wanqiu Lu, Jun Liu, Lina Wang, Qihong Fan, Jiang Wu, Hanling Shen, Rong Jiao, Chunxi Chen, Xiaoling Gao, Maoqiang Tian, Wei Lu, Yonghong Yang, Gary Wing-Kin Wong, Tianyou Wang, Runming Jin, Adong Shen, Baoping Xu, Kunling Shen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 23 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#999,853
of 26,483,923 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#172
of 8,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,788
of 459,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#9
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,483,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.