↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a Higher Number of Species of Odontotermes (Isoptera) than Currently Known from Peninsular Malaysia from Mitochondrial DNA Phylogenies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for a Higher Number of Species of Odontotermes (Isoptera) than Currently Known from Peninsular Malaysia from Mitochondrial DNA Phylogenies
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shawn Cheng, Laurence G. Kirton, Jothi M. Panandam, Siti S. Siraj, Kevin Kit-Siong Ng, Soon-Guan Tan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,442,064
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#77,681
of 195,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,172
of 112,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#706
of 1,835 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,835 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.