The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Função da tuba auditiva em adultos com membrana timpânica íntegra
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1808-86942010000300012 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renata Rumy Makibara, Jackeline Yumi Fukunaga, Daniela Gil |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 21% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 58% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#143
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,225
of 105,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.