The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na+ Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2010.00010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ruben Coronel, Francien J. G. Wilms-Schopman, Michiel J. Janse |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,718
of 14,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,920
of 166,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.