The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors Behind the Higher COVID-19 Risk in Diabetes: A Critical Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.591982 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amany Magdy Beshbishy, Victor B. Oti, Diaa E. Hussein, Ibrahim F. Rehan, Oluyomi S. Adeyemi, Nallely Rivero-Perez, Adrian Zaragoza-Bastida, Muhammad Ajmal Shah, Khaled Abouelezz, Helal F. Hetta, Natália Cruz-Martins, Gaber El-Saber Batiha |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Researcher | 6 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 68 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 70 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,830,390
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#702
of 10,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,612
of 438,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#47
of 625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.