↓ Skip to main content

High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Immune Repertoire Study during Infectious Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Immune Repertoire Study during Infectious Disease
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongni Hou, Cuicui Chen, Eric John Seely, Shujing Chen, Yuanlin Song

Abstract

The selectivity of the adaptive immune response is based on the enormous diversity of T and B cell antigen-specific receptors. The immune repertoire, the collection of T and B cells with functional diversity in the circulatory system at any given time, is dynamic and reflects the essence of immune selectivity. In this article, we review the recent advances in immune repertoire study of infectious diseases, which were achieved by traditional techniques and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) techniques. HTS techniques enable the determination of complementary regions of lymphocyte receptors with unprecedented efficiency and scale. This progress in methodology enhances the understanding of immunologic changes during pathogen challenge and also provides a basis for further development of novel diagnostic markers, immunotherapies, and vaccines.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,267,850
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,008
of 33,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,164
of 351,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#53
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.