↓ Skip to main content

Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
109 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2021
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julián Aliste, Sebastián Layera, Daniela Bravo, Álvaro Jara, Gonzalo Muñoz, Cristián Barrientos, Rodrigo Wulf, Julián Brañez, Roderick J Finlayson, De Q Tran

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 59 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 59 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2024.
All research outputs
#652,691
of 26,812,496 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#52
of 2,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,091
of 452,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,812,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.