The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Theory, critical analysis, and the challenge of interdisciplinary thought at the crossroads of collective health, the environment, and geography
|
---|---|
Published in |
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-59702012000100020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lúcia Cony Faria Cidade |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 40% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 40% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#1,582
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,627
of 173,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.