The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient-Specific Virtual Stent-Graft Deployment for Type B Aortic Dissection: A Pilot Study of the Impact of Stent-Graft Length
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.718140 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoxin Kan, Tao Ma, Zhihui Dong, Xiao Yun Xu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#12,906,680
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,916
of 14,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,509
of 434,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#139
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.