↓ Skip to main content

Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013397.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Emma Connaughton, Gill Norman

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Master 22 8%
Researcher 14 5%
Other 13 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 155 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 14%
Unspecified 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 161 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,211,887
of 26,794,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,297
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,476
of 449,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.