The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fish farm effluent as a nutrient source for algae biomass cultivation
|
---|---|
Published in |
South African Journal of Science, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.17159/sajs.2021/8694 |
Authors |
Uzochukwu O. Enwereuzoh, Kevin G. Harding, Michelle Low |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
Engineering | 4 | 12% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,256,796
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#216
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,867
of 441,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.