The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brainstem Pain-Modulation Circuitry and Its Plasticity in Neuropathic Pain: Insights From Human Brain Imaging Investigations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pain Research, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpain.2021.705345 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily P. Mills, Kevin A. Keay, Luke A. Henderson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 9 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,538,034
of 26,413,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pain Research
#49
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,255
of 446,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pain Research
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,413,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.