↓ Skip to main content

Karyotype versus Microarray Testing for Genetic Abnormalities after Stillbirth

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
60 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Karyotype versus Microarray Testing for Genetic Abnormalities after Stillbirth
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1201569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uma M Reddy, Grier P Page, George R Saade, Robert M Silver, Vanessa R Thorsten, Corette B Parker, Halit Pinar, Marian Willinger, Barbara J Stoll, Josefine Heim-Hall, Michael W Varner, Robert L Goldenberg, Radek Bukowski, Ronald J Wapner, Carolyn D Drews-Botsch, Barbara M O'Brien, Donald J Dudley, Brynn Levy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 201 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 23%
Other 30 14%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Psychology 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 48 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 487. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#54,099
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,746
of 32,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235
of 286,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#11
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.