The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 401 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long covid: A Delphi study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0265 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martine Nurek, Clare Rayner, Anette Freyer, Sharon Taylor, Linn Järte, Nathalie MacDermott, Brendan C Delaney, on behalf of the Delphi panellists, Nisreen Alwan, Emily Attree, Jennifer Blair, Mary-Ann Bowen, Nicola J Brobbel, Ciara Burgess, Michael Cannell, Christopher Dixon, Nell Freeman-Romilly, Sonali Gaur, Thea Haldane, Melissa Heightman, Theresa Howe, Parul Kalia, Ramzi Khamis, Muhammed Asad Khan, Emma Ladds, Amali Lokugamage, Harsha Master, Rebecca Macfarlane, Anna Paes, Sonia Parmar, Elizabeth Potter, Manoj Sivan, Sarah May Taylor, Margarita Thomson, Avril Washington, Katherine Wildon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 12% |
| United States | 14 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 301 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 304 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 15% |
| Scientists | 30 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 94 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2024.
All research outputs
#101,001
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#37
of 5,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,946
of 445,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.