↓ Skip to main content

Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health Perspectives, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
78 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
802 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004
Published in
Environmental Health Perspectives, January 2011
DOI 10.1289/ehp.1002727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey J. Woodruff, Ami R. Zota, Jackie M. Schwartz

Abstract

Exposure to chemicals during fetal development can increase the risk of adverse health effects, and while biomonitoring studies suggest pregnant women are exposed to chemicals, little is known about the extent of multiple chemicals exposures among pregnant women in the United States.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 382 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 17%
Researcher 61 15%
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 72 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 18%
Environmental Science 52 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Other 88 22%
Unknown 94 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#203,197
of 26,561,164 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health Perspectives
#218
of 9,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#793
of 198,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health Perspectives
#5
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.