The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Different Clinicopathologic and Computed Tomography Imaging Characteristics of Primary and Acquired EGFR T790M Mutations in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s323972 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Donghui Hou, Weihua Li, Sicong Wang, Yao Huang, Jianwei Wang, Wei Tang, Lina Zhou, Linlin Qi, Ning Wu, Shijun Zhao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,062
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,791
of 433,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#65
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.