The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Free Radical Stabilization Techniques on in vivo Mechanical Changes in Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Liners
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orthopedic research and reviews, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/orr.s309210 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Decker, Amber Price, Aria Khalili, Robert Klassen, Mary Jane Walzak, Matthew Teeter, Richard McCalden, Brent Lanting |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,148,228
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedic research and reviews
#18
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,579
of 446,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedic research and reviews
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.