↓ Skip to main content

Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001241.pub8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam J Oddie, Lauren Young, William McGuire

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 270 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 10%
Other 24 9%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 5%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 140 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 149 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,033,250
of 26,587,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,893
of 13,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,942
of 440,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.