↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics of Cancer ncRNA in High Throughput Sequencing: Present State and Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioinformatics of Cancer ncRNA in High Throughput Sequencing: Present State and Challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Andressa Nogueira Jorge, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Fabio Passetti

Abstract

The numerous genome sequencing projects produced unprecedented amount of data providing significant information to the discovery of novel non-coding RNA (ncRNA). Several ncRNAs have been described to control gene expression and display important role during cell differentiation and homeostasis. In the last decade, high throughput methods in conjunction with approaches in bioinformatics have been used to identify, classify, and evaluate the expression of hundreds of ncRNA in normal and pathological states, such as cancer. Patient outcomes have been already associated with differential expression of ncRNAs in normal and tumoral tissues, providing new insights in the development of innovative therapeutic strategies in oncology. In this review, we present and discuss bioinformatics advances in the development of computational approaches to analyze and discover ncRNA data in oncology using high throughput sequencing technologies.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,158,070
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,890
of 11,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,487
of 244,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#116
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.