The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors of Bacterial Keratitis: The Nottingham Infectious Keratitis Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.715118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Darren Shu Jeng Ting, Jessica Cairns, Bhavesh P. Gopal, Charlotte Shan Ho, Lazar Krstic, Ahmad Elsahn, Michelle Lister, Dalia G. Said, Harminder S. Dua |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 34 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 37 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,063
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,835
of 431,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#85
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.