The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nest-site selection and hatching success of waterbirds in coastal Virginia: some results of habitat manipulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Field Ornithology, October 2004
|
DOI | 10.1648/0273-8570-75.4.317 |
Authors |
R. A. Rounds, R. Michael Erwin, John H. Porter |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Estonia | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Field Ornithology
#247
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,929
of 76,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Field Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them