The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Natural History of Medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Biomechanical and Clinical Case Perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.744065 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edward R. Floyd, Ariel N. Rodriguez, Kari L. Falaas, Gregory B. Carlson, Jorge Chahla, Andrew G. Geeslin, Robert F. LaPrade |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Sweden | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 19% |
Engineering | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 29 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,003
of 6,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,010
of 433,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#147
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.