The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The participation of Wajãpi women from the State of Amapá (Brazil) in the traditional use of medicinal plants – a case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-8-48 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nely Dayse Santos da Mata, Rosinaldo Silva de Sousa, Fábio F Perazzo, José Carlos Tavares Carvalho |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to analyze the importance of traditional medicinal plants use to Wajãpi women in the State of Amapá, Brazil, as well as their practices in the local common illnesses of treatment considering the prevailing practice by non-Indians. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,642,943
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#268
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,875
of 294,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.