The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 EF-14 Clinical Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.671972 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zvi Ram, Chae-Yong Kim, Andreas F. Hottinger, Ahmed Idbaih, Garth Nicholas, Jay-Jiguang Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Researcher | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 21 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#21,064,103
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,551
of 22,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,586
of 438,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#678
of 1,447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.