↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Coronary Calcium Score by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Relation to Endothelial Function and Inflammatory Markers in Asymptomatic Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Coronary Calcium Score by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Relation to Endothelial Function and Inflammatory Markers in Asymptomatic Individuals
Published in
Circulation Journal, January 2008
DOI 10.1253/circj.72.778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmoud M. Ramadan, Essam M. Mahfouz, Gamal F. Gomaa, Tarek A. El-Diasty, Louie Alldawi, Taruna Ikrar, Ding Limin, Makoto Kodama, Yoshifusa Aizawa

Abstract

Coronary calcification has been correlated with the presence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), so in the present study the associations between coronary artery calcification score (CACS) and endothelial dysfunction, as well as the important inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL), were studied in asymptomatic individuals at intermediate risk for CAD.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Researcher 5 18%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,417,612
of 24,280,456 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#81
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,222
of 163,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,280,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.