The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Multimodal Risk Network Predicts Executive Function Trajectories in Non-demented Aging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.621023 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shraddha Sapkota, G. Peggy McFall, Mario Masellis, Roger A. Dixon |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,065
of 4,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,309
of 402,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#106
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.