The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Programmed Cell Death Not as Sledgehammer but as Chisel: Apoptosis in Normal and Abnormal Craniofacial Patterning and Development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2021.717404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia Compagnucci, Kira Martinus, John Griffin, Michael J. Depew |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,635,125
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#4,035
of 9,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,396
of 434,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#364
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.