The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a magnetic resonance microscope using a high Tc bulk superconducting magnet
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Physics Letters, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1063/1.3598440 |
Authors |
Kyohei Ogawa, Takashi Nakamura, Yasuhiko Terada, Katsumi Kose, Tomoyuki Haishi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 25% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 13 | 46% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 14% |
Chemistry | 3 | 11% |
Materials Science | 2 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,977,738
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics Letters
#8,869
of 34,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,452
of 115,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics Letters
#60
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.