The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Therapeuetic aspects of cluster headache in the practical clinical site
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.1134 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kiyoshi Owada |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology
#115
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,490
of 291,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology
#7
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.