The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Anti-Wear Additives on Seizure Resistance of Vegetable Oils in Four-Ball Test
|
---|---|
Published in |
TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1299/kikaic.70.554 |
Authors |
Hiromasa NADANO, Masakazu NAKASAKO, Masaki KOHNO, Ichiro MINAMI, Hiroyuki YAMAGUCHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 3 | 75% |
Engineering | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,253
of 138,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them