The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pathophysiology and Treatment of Glaucoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.5363/tits.15.7_18 |
Authors |
Miyo MATSUMURA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#151
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,985
of 175,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.