The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
日本における「インターネット依存」調査のメタ分析
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Information and Communication Research, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.11430/jsicr.31.4_51 |
Authors |
小寺 敦之 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 29% |
Lecturer | 2 | 29% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 71% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information and Communication Research
#19
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,155
of 243,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information and Communication Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them