The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
オリイジネズミの分類上の地位について
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.11238/jmammsocjapan1952.2.17 |
Authors |
今泉 吉典 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,481,694
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan
#1
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,358
of 106,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 48 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.