↓ Skip to main content

ヘーゲルの『美学講義』 : <作られた>テクストの解釈の試み(美学会第四十五回全国大会報告)

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 186)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ヘーゲルの『美学講義』 : <作られた>テクストの解釈の試み(美学会第四十五回全国大会報告)
Published in
Aesthetics, May 2017
DOI 10.20631/bigaku.45.3_48
Authors

岩城 見一

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetics
#18
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,470
of 328,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetics
#11
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.