The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of coping strategies after bereavement among spouses of cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.4992/jjpsy.84.498 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mariko Asai, Yutaka Matsui, Yosuke Uchitomi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 3 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#165
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,490
of 291,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.