The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Sigma Phase Precipitated at 850 °C on Corrosion Behaviour of UNS S82441 Duplex Stainless Steel
|
---|---|
Published in |
Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1517-707620190003.0775 |
Authors |
Daniel Amâncio Cavalcanti, Palloma Vieira Muterlle, Gustavo Reinke |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 25% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
#7
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,987
of 439,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.