↓ Skip to main content

A Taxonomic Study of Chrysosplenium fauriae Group (Saxifragaceae), with Description of a New Species

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 105)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Taxonomic Study of Chrysosplenium fauriae Group (Saxifragaceae), with Description of a New Species
Published in
Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica, September 2017
DOI 10.18942/bunruichiri.kj00001079075
Authors

MICHIO WAKABAYASHI, HIDEAKI OHBA

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#9,017,337
of 26,587,745 outputs
Outputs from Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica
#5
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,861
of 332,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica
#4
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.