↓ Skip to main content

Coexisting With Different Human-Wildlife Coexistence Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coexisting With Different Human-Wildlife Coexistence Perspectives
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2021.703174
Authors

Jenny Anne Glikman, Beatrice Frank, Kirstie A. Ruppert, Jillian Knox, Carly C. Sponarski, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, Alexander L. Metcalf, Silvio Marchini

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 5 5%
Student > Master 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 25%
Environmental Science 20 20%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,694,952
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#67
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,949
of 438,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.